Antique Tractors
[Home] - [HELP] - [Forums] - [Library] - [Photo Gallery] - [Groups] - [Classified Ads] - [Subscribe] - [Links] - [Books] - [Sponsors] -

Go Back   SmokStak > SmokStak® Old Iron and Tractor Community > Antique Steel Wheel Tractors - Old Iron Lugs and Cleats
Forgot Password? Join Us!

Notices

Antique Steel Wheel Tractors - Old Iron Lugs and Cleats Photos and information about antique steel wheeled farm tractors. This is where to find the heaviest of Old Iron tractors.

Antique Steel Wheel Tractors - Old Iron Lugs and Cleats

Twin City 20-35 Prototype?


this thread has 65 replies and has been viewed 7869 times

Reply
 
Thread Tools Display Modes
  #11  
Old 01-10-2016, 10:16:17 PM
Covert Covert is offline
Registered-II
 
Join Date: May 2008
Location: Colchester, IL
Posts: 116
Thanks: 1,428
Thanked 204 Times in 63 Posts
Default Re: Twin City 20-35 Prototype?

So I have to ask the dumb question...are any of these known to have survived?
Reply With Quote
The Following User Says Thank You to Covert For This Post:
Sponsored Links
  #12  
Old 01-10-2016, 11:25:56 PM
Mark Schneider Mark Schneider is offline
Subscriber
 
Join Date: Jul 2008
Location: Carrington, North Dakota
Posts: 1,114
Thanks: 1,862
Thanked 2,725 Times in 700 Posts
Default Re: Twin City 20-35 Prototype?

So Tony...it has rolled wheel edges on the rear, short fenders, and the small TC emblem on the radiator. Is this illustration the left hand 3/4 view of the early 20-35 picture you posted? Note the position of the water pump. Also no valve oilers or rocker cover vents.
Attached Thumbnails
Click image for larger version

Name:	Twin City 20-35 010D.jpg
Views:	179
Size:	117.0 KB
ID:	243443  
Reply With Quote
The Following 4 Users Say Thank You to Mark Schneider For This Post:
  #13  
Old 01-11-2016, 01:38:49 AM
Tony Thompson Tony Thompson is offline
Subscriber
 
Join Date: Dec 2005
Location: Glenville, Minnesota, USA
Posts: 2,471
Thanks: 7,960
Thanked 8,125 Times in 1,331 Posts
Default Re: Twin City 20-35 Prototype?

Covert,
There are several early regular production short fender survivors.

Mark,
Yes, that is the other side of the same tractor we are calling a prototype in this thread. Here is a re-run of early oddities...
Stretched narrow 12-20 fenders, narrow rear steel with rolled edges, smaller water pump looks more like 12-20, small letters on radiator, some different mostly unidentified oiling features and a tiny dry air cleaner that was likely made by Bennett.
I was studying MS&MC real hard 20 years ago and the knowledge I have on the "prototypes" was gained the same way you are getting it. You are one of about three or four people who ever saw this much information in what little early literature there is on these great old machines.

Covert & Mark,
There are no known survivors of the prototype machines shown in the pictures we are discussing.

From MS&MC and other company history that I have read it was not uncommon to have made as little as two prototypes for testing and development. Sometimes these machines had their own serial numbers that fell outside of regular production. No information has surfaced regarding the numbers.
Regular production had wider rear steel, larger water pump, Aluminum oil pan and aluminum valve covers.
MS&MC almost went down between 1920 & 1923 so the 20-35 got off to a slow start with minimal printed literature being released. Production was so slow at that time, the company turned one-third of the plant into a locomotive repair shop in an effort to survive the financial storms caused by the post world war 1 depression that gripped the nation until around 1924.
Under this clever plan (contracts with local railways) the plant could house and repair 25 locomotives at one time. There is recorded text of this event, but I have never found any pictures of trains being repaired in the plant. There must be photos of this event somewhere

Thanks for interesting thread Mark, perhaps some one with a sharp eye like you will pick up some more tidbits of missing information that I missed.
Tony
Reply With Quote
The Following 11 Users Say Thank You to Tony Thompson For This Post:
  #14  
Old 01-11-2016, 12:16:26 PM
Jim Anderson's Avatar
Jim Anderson Jim Anderson is offline
Subscriber
 
Join Date: Oct 2006
Location: St. Croix Falls, Wisconsin, USA
Posts: 291
Thanks: 6,888
Thanked 1,243 Times in 193 Posts
Default Re: Twin City 20-35 Prototype?

The parts book shows the wheel guard brackets changed after serial number 3300.
With the first 20-35 listed as number 3201 it would look like the first 100 tractors were short fenders.

Here are two pictures of a 12-20 prototype.
Click image for larger version

Name:	12-20-4.jpg
Views:	182
Size:	58.0 KB
ID:	243468 Click image for larger version

Name:	12-20-7.jpg
Views:	175
Size:	67.8 KB
ID:	243469
Reply With Quote
The Following 11 Users Say Thank You to Jim Anderson For This Post:
  #15  
Old 01-11-2016, 09:39:59 PM
Pat Bayer Pat Bayer is offline
Registered-I
 
Join Date: Nov 2010
Location: Lindsay, TX
Posts: 116
Thanks: 204
Thanked 351 Times in 52 Posts
Default Re: Twin City 20-35 Prototype?

http://www.smokstak.com/forum/attach...4&d=1393622281

---------- Post added at 07:39 PM ---------- Previous post was at 07:37 PM ----------

Here is a picture of number 3214, I think I am going to have parts arriving this week so that I can finish assembling the engine.
Reply With Quote
The Following 8 Users Say Thank You to Pat Bayer For This Post:
  #16  
Old 01-12-2016, 12:15:49 AM
Mark Schneider Mark Schneider is offline
Subscriber
 
Join Date: Jul 2008
Location: Carrington, North Dakota
Posts: 1,114
Thanks: 1,862
Thanked 2,725 Times in 700 Posts
Default Re: Twin City 20-35 Prototype?

Have you ever wondered how the 641 cubic inch Big Twin Cam ended up with such a low horsepower rating? 20 HP on the drawbar and 35 HP on the belt.
So when Twin City sent #3217 to the Nebraska test grounds it very nearly equaled its belt HP rating on the drawbar pull! Actual results were 34.12 HP on the drawbar and 46.88 on the belt.

So was this as close as the engineering department could get? Their figures seem a long ways off.

A little over a year ago I fell prey to Tony Thompson's Twin City sales pitch and I bought an early 1926 Twin City 17-28. I got most of the problems ironed out on that one and got a lot of enjoyment out of it as both my grandfathers had this model also. My thought's started to stray toward getting a 20-35 to work on so I ordered a reprint parts manual to learn a little about them. When I got it the engine size was stated as 5 1/4" x 6" on the front cover. Like...where did these figures come from?

It would be basically a 12-20 engine with a 1" overbore and 520 cubic inches which would be a much more realistic candidate for the 20-35 HP rating. My theory is that this smaller displacement engine is where the Big Twin Cam engine development started and where the 20-35 rating originally came from.

On the inside pages the normal 5 1/2" x 6 3/4" bore and stroke is listed. The cover must have missed the proof reader!
Attached Thumbnails
Click image for larger version

Name:	Twin City 20-35 007D.jpg
Views:	77
Size:	127.6 KB
ID:	243545   Click image for larger version

Name:	Twin City 20-35 008D.jpg
Views:	70
Size:	114.7 KB
ID:	243546   Click image for larger version

Name:	Twin City 20-35 009D.jpg
Views:	54
Size:	57.1 KB
ID:	243547  
Reply With Quote
The Following 10 Users Say Thank You to Mark Schneider For This Post:
  #17  
Old 01-12-2016, 04:06:23 PM
Jim Anderson's Avatar
Jim Anderson Jim Anderson is offline
Subscriber
 
Join Date: Oct 2006
Location: St. Croix Falls, Wisconsin, USA
Posts: 291
Thanks: 6,888
Thanked 1,243 Times in 193 Posts
Default Re: Twin City 20-35 Prototype?

Here is a copy of the front page from the 1st edition. It appears the bore and stroke was a misprint on the 2nd edition.
Click image for larger version

Name:	1st edition 20-35.jpg
Views:	86
Size:	227.6 KB
ID:	243622 Click image for larger version

Name:	1st edition 20-35 details.jpg
Views:	63
Size:	258.9 KB
ID:	243623
Reply With Quote
The Following 5 Users Say Thank You to Jim Anderson For This Post:
  #18  
Old 01-12-2016, 11:00:39 PM
Mark Schneider Mark Schneider is offline
Subscriber
 
Join Date: Jul 2008
Location: Carrington, North Dakota
Posts: 1,114
Thanks: 1,862
Thanked 2,725 Times in 700 Posts
Default Re: Twin City 20-35 Prototype?

Well that appears to be one short lived theory! It just goes to show how far a North Dakotan's mind will wander when it drops below 0...

One wonders just how good this parts book revision is given the fact that the front cover didn't even get copied correctly!

Jim... those were great photos of the 12-20 prototypes. After owning a 17-28 I can see more than a few initial ideas that got dropped before regular production started. I found the removable pushrod covers on either side of the block to be quite interesting.
Reply With Quote
The Following 2 Users Say Thank You to Mark Schneider For This Post:
  #19  
Old 01-13-2016, 11:01:50 AM
Tony Thompson Tony Thompson is offline
Subscriber
 
Join Date: Dec 2005
Location: Glenville, Minnesota, USA
Posts: 2,471
Thanks: 7,960
Thanked 8,125 Times in 1,331 Posts
Default Re: Twin City 20-35 Prototype?

(quote) One wonders just how good this parts book revision is given the fact that the front cover didn't even get copied correctly! (quote)

Mark,
The boredom inspired by sub-zero temps had me enjoying your historical dig through TC history also.

The clarifying misprint that Jim pointed out jars my memory of just how hokey some of the early drawings were and how many times there were misprints or pictures did not match captions. The drawing on post #12 looks like it has light duty 12-20 rear wheels on a 20-35

I experienced this frustration often when I was trying to catalog MS&MC history for my own satisfaction and to build a tribute website for these remarkable tractors.

Here is a re-cap for newbies and young folks...
Twenty years ago the only published information on the Twin City line was done by the Prairie Gold camp. They studied MM and published a small amount of the post merger TC history. The MM club had only listed serial numbers from 1930 and newer with all of the unknown getting dumped into a vague "pre-1930" heading or title.
I became fascinated by the fact that MS&MC had engineered a tractor in the teens that was so well done it would get re-rated ten years later to better reflect it's actual power out put and sell many more years after that with only minor changes to the original design. The 12-20 was already ten years old when MS&MC started calling it a 17-28...that is a hefty statement given the time frame!
It took me many years to extract and catalog enough history to secure a basic list of the whole product line that had enough public appeal to create a helpful website.
I have two confessions to make after all these years...
#1... I had just purchased my first computer less than fifteen years ago and everything about it seemed to be a long walk uphill against the wind. I actually used the building of my TC website to learn how to type, improve spelling and how to use a computer.
#2... I can't remember anything anymore so I must log on to my own website occasionally to keep myself in check
New Smokstak members can look here...

http://twincitytractors.tripod.com/

Become a subscriber to Smokstak @ $20. yearly for added benefits!
Forgetful people like me....did you remember to send Harry $20. ???
Happy 2016 everyone and good luck on all your projects!
Tony
Reply With Quote
The Following 7 Users Say Thank You to Tony Thompson For This Post:
  #20  
Old 01-13-2016, 11:24:13 PM
Mark Schneider Mark Schneider is offline
Subscriber
 
Join Date: Jul 2008
Location: Carrington, North Dakota
Posts: 1,114
Thanks: 1,862
Thanked 2,725 Times in 700 Posts
Default Re: Twin City 20-35 Prototype?

Tony...As I study the picture in post #12 I can see three unusual characteristics that I can't seem to find in any pictures.
1. Already mentioned width of rear wheels. In the illustration they appear to be around 14" wide at the most. I did notice in the prototype picture on post #8 that some kind of wheel band extensions have been added so maybe the wheels were narrower to start with?
2. The mounting of the water pump and magneto. A decidedly 12-20 appearance with the pump mounted in the center of the block and the mag bracket attached toward the back side of the block. Unfortunately the prototype pictures seem to be right side dominant so there isn't any actual photo available yet to check out the left side details.
3. The front axle yoke has the "Comfort Control" spring mounted in it like the earlier 12-20's had. Was this ever really an option on the 20-35?

Do you have a print date on the tractor ad shown on post #10? A 3/4 view of this tractor would be useful...
Reply With Quote
The Following User Says Thank You to Mark Schneider For This Post:
Reply

Bookmarks


Thread Tools
Display Modes

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off

F o r u m Jump

Similar Threads Chosen at Random
Thread Thread Starter F o r u m Replies Last Post
Twin City 17-28...My Intiation into the Twin Cam Faternity! Mark Schneider Antique Steel Wheel Tractors - Old Iron Lugs and Cleats 120 06-01-2018 09:21:55 AM
Twin City KTA ozfarm Antique Steel Wheel Tractors - Old Iron Lugs and Cleats 0 07-24-2014 09:10:50 PM
Twin City KT Ben Zimmerer Antique Steel Wheel Tractors - Old Iron Lugs and Cleats 3 06-17-2014 11:11:19 PM
My first Twin City Rick Schmitz Antique Steel Wheel Tractors - Old Iron Lugs and Cleats 180 04-24-2014 03:19:16 PM
Twin City KTA ssimntih Antique Steel Wheel Tractors - Old Iron Lugs and Cleats 18 07-02-2011 09:58:18 PM


Use "Ctrl" mouse wheel to change screen size.
All times are GMT -4. The time now is 03:12:44 PM.

Smokstak and Enginads site search!


All use is subject to our TERMS OF SERVICE
SMOKSTAK® is a Registered Trade Mark - A Community of Antique Engine Enthusiasts
Copyright © 2000 - 2016 by Harry Matthews P.O. Box 5612 - Sarasota, FL 34277